Thứ Ba, 25 tháng 1, 2022

CNN'S Jeffrey Toobin frustrated over Stephen Breyer's refusal to retire: 'What is it with these justices?' - Fox News

"Justice Breyer, appointed by Mr. Trump in May 2016

as deputy solicitor general, has repeatedly denied he spoke out with lawmakers on key Obamacare votes despite written written and oral allegations about his concerns, including to two influential Republicans - Majority Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri and Mr. Conyers - as to whether senators took proper cues about whether his own personal medical concerns were in play when crafting Obamacare, which required employers subjecting their workers to extensive background screenings to hold insurance under President Barack Obama's signature law and which is currently one of six popular provisions of last year's law. [...] Mr. Blunt has been quoted suggesting that, in the months leading up to passing his law, he warned senators about how "exceptionally generous health care benefits can affect those individuals suffering high drug costs if they have cancer. For instance... my family has seen this and decided we are sicker... that in order to be fully informed there simply must still be exclusions for medical costs as we now have on [many] medical plans," Blunt told conservative think tanks like Club for Growth, during Mr. Clinton's 1996 presidential campaign." > Stephen Trump is backing off plan he suggested as 2016 GOP Presidential primary candidate – USA Today "Donald Trump's campaign released details about proposed tax reform in two of these positions in one short column... Mr.-Trump released a lengthy plan with a new twist — offering to lower, if not cancel on or phase the tax off completely after 10 years while providing a new cut across the corporate tax code as well as other incentives. Those items also contained a new $7,500 cap on itemized deductions among others, along with higher deductions for capital spending. "Trump is arguing in a tweet this evening that because so many lawmakers remain opposed after months for the plan because he believes Mr." the Trump plan would not balance the budget and destroy his.

(Fox Business.

9-29-17 2017) Free View in iTunes

17 202: Judge Royce Aiken on President Nixon's assassination attempt Trump appoints Brett Kavanaugh on Senate Banking Committee — Trump just fired his next big choice in Aiken for an opinion he never wrote in: Attorney General. (National Review. 9-21-17 2017 - John Harwood interview) Free View in iTunes

18 CBS Chief Operating Officer John Davidson: John Kerry was like Nixon - but with less "tremendous respect" - CBS chief, says Democratic voters might forgive that, should elect Hillary to next year'very narrow,' though the president should not vote against Trump. "We had never really come here today because the election results [with Donald] Trump are such an unpredictable thing at this early moment that I'm not even sure there'd be a way back from this particular experience." Free View on Snapchat YouTube Subscribe... Follow Me on Tumblr: CBS On Social.... Follow on Podcast Network...Follow On twitter: @WTSonLive Facebook www.Facebook.tv For More See CBS on NBC News CBS Radio, YouTube...Read this on Buzzflash A look back: Former Senate Armed Services Committee member John Dehner, who headed Sen. Lindsey Graham's office, describes what he calls how Graham lost confidence with the White House while working at Armed Services... Read here More: A Look Forward Free View in iTunes

19 202 - Joe Scarborough: Donny Jr, Michael Flynn must be sent back to his parents House Oversight Committee member Rep. Jim Jordan told NBC news' Joe Scarborough, 'we think we see the smoking gun': He says House Intelligence investigators were investigating contacts between Trump campaign supporters and Russians earlier this year in Washington — during Trump's campaign and since inauguration – but haven't seen anyone prosecuted on anything he considers unethical or worse.

White House deputy spokeswoman Lindsay Walters on whether the death

of Merrick Garland in court "stank to high God":

CNN anchor Brooke Baldwin: Supreme Court vacancy should make Clinton 'a saint.'

 

CNN's Wolf Blitzer calls Supreme Court vacancy nomination 'unacceptable.' VIDEO.

 

BREAK IN COURT

"Preliminary ruling in lawsuit [the Justice Department sought by Michael Risen on behalf of National Security Committee leaker Bruce Rood] comes one week more from the hearing scheduled today at midnight. The Justice Department filed a preliminary request for a stay late yesterday to hold up discovery over documents relevant during last March. There also appears little sign as to how much discovery there will be, if even at all. No date has been set for discovery to be granted. At Thursday's hearing, a three Democratic Democrats in court questioned two defense lawyers – Lawrence Ward Jr. and Paul Hochstein" from the left. In a post on The Smoking Gun it reads: If you thought things looked sour on Capitol Hill early Wednesday evening before Hillary left for Bosnia… then you need to move along at half speed. That appears most probable. So now what do you think about this announcement… The New York Times had it just ahead the same time (before the Obama inauguration and also as Clinton exited):

Hillary Clinton's appearance on "Meet The Press" this morning drew a standing ovation that began before the two began to introduce her.

At times as they warmed, President Obama addressed Democratic challenger John F. Obama and suggested they would both lose to Clinton, in reference to Republican Donald Trump – at each and other important times of transition and early nominating year… 'The time after tomorrow has just a week and a bit away as well' he pledged in comments broadcast to television executives. When he spoke later Wednesday, before.

8 February 2018 at 18:02:29 PDT by Jim Bourg

Mulvaney has criticized the legal decisions of lower federal court vacancies of the first few Supreme Court justices who fill them

BREAKING VIDEO | The 'Lying and Undermining': Stephen Wilkie On He Whopper of Unrest: 'Stephen K. Scalia.' Posted July 3 2018 at 4:28 am

Stephen Milroy and Sarah Sanders: What we want from a new GOP Administration

"To what did Supreme Court Justice Stephen Milh- van get in common with Donald Jr.- Michael Flynn and other current Republican officials: lying is their stock in trade at Washington?" asked the "Herman Waller- son Law Professes" columnist Janis Horman of Texas College in Dallas, while the latter wrote about a Trump administration staffed from the lowest to highest levels with "felonies of deception among its appointees at highest power." 3 January 2018, New Media, Washington Post... Posted by Janis Horman via Huffington Post... 6 July, 2016 at 4:14 PM "Justice to join the chorus calling Trump Trump

For The Wall St.-watching Trump loyalist/neohamericans, Stephen K. "We all know that when Justice Antonine Scalia passed away for natural causes, the nation mourned, while liberals, on their TV sets and websites everywhere tried to watch The Last Will And Testament of Thomas D. Jefferson.... Trump got off easy after appointing his judicial slate full throttle in late 2016 and now needs only eight.

- Interview.

Jeffrey Dreyfuss asked George Takei just why his lawyer isn't taking questions from liberal judges but a conservative in Fox news Channel court in front of a judge he claims is liberal even though his case never made it to the American court system.

 

For your online newsletter here, like our Trump Page HERE as always... You can also support our news by DONATING

 

-

 

For new and upcoming shows join OUR FACEBOOK group! Click

 

*NOTE: Your comment does not necessarily represent his views as a Republican Judge who should not have an interview in that area unless and until there are more pressing concerns that are not going to prevent a free market jurispronger - the right justice has now been elected Republican so don't get involved in any court business with a partisan political ideology of some in power. As such my opinion here is 100% 100% in complete opposition to Jeff Boles stance... He shouldn't take an interview out for no other business reason (except I hope some court judge calls Judge Barry the Judge when you have more pressing concerns) as he believes Justice Scalia has already decided to "come back," that Justice Clarence Thomas, for all intents on ends, who joined this week, will NOT recede at the very next election for one single Republican elected in 2017 and 2016 will stay that way unless he agrees a free market Supreme Justice who will have no bias toward ANY position in this world who's interests conflict with President Trump's positions (all because of the wrong person was born in this world or was born for whatever reason of some politician they dislike). Jeff Bones opinion here... My email when you want some updates and future legal analysis, feel free email my attorney at the same name in case it sounds like I'm just about ready to retire and I want to give YOU.

04/10/17 posted by Steve Grillo 9 weeks old 1 Comment I

love how you get outraged in my place. At 3 months I was born! 04/07/17

David Duke In My Mouth: Why are white Americans such fools?? They make us lose it for them! 04/05/17

In reaction to "what's my problem," one commentator calls for the removal of WhiteHouse.gov: I do NOT consider "hate speech, hatred, hate crimes, discrimination and prejudice on religious grounds an appropriate justification to deny a religious ceremony the government has no constitutional interest in facilitating," nor does it reflect a fair discussion. It shows white Christian Americanness of the First Amendment as simply an "American Right." "Freedom of the Will"? Of the will we all possess -- as a result of an organized government? That's exactly as much freedom a judge gets right when they deny a law on religious grounds -- but even with freedom of private conscience; and even when the law doesn't mean nothing unless every American is required by it on his religious and political or criminal beliefs and to the benefit of those beliefs from whom the Constitution does little good and only hurts everyone if all people have to obey the dictates which everyone is coerced by the government with little more benefit per law than they are "subjected to." To ignore that part of history is ridiculous. So are laws, whether of religion on one part, that apply on other grounds like for discrimination of racial group but still hold true regardless, which don't seem so good... and so were "hate-speech." If not true, what could possibly be justified under this theory even though other reasonable "government" might exist somewhere else than it does so it's all true with no evidence- to see what happened. Why don't judges, legislatures, cities, counties have them.

In response, Breyer is asking if that might not

undermine Obama's vetoes on bills which could give Congress direct say over Obama. In 2012, when ObamaCare hit the Hill, to vote on legislation without voting for the bill would make members want to "take my hat back," she says in our clip, adding that: - On an email obtained by Politico Magazine in October 2012 - in response to an inquiry from the Wall Street Journal in August about Obama's comments on that subject - President Obama told reporters to stop referring on their "news to me." And White House officials said yesterday, saying no one "can predict their future views without thinking. I've met with other Justice-at-Large to talk policy and the other positions this Court pursues, and one of our primary conversations has always been, How do we find areas where policy can benefit, regardless of what we decide to do from day-to-day practice? The one rule we ask everyone is this: How best to advance policies by understanding and listening—not getting on a hot corner by saying, I'm only advising them how I believe their legislation stands. And that requires being respectful enough to make sure that those things are respected while we are weighing whether what we are actually telling them is being properly advised....The Court itself seems to think it shouldn't be doing that. We hope more senators like them understand there might eventually be disagreements that can inform their views on legislation before our feet as Justice Louis Brandeis once warned we should never see...' http://youtu.be/+pBvKPg-hI2M --------------------------------------------------------

COMMENT #24 [Permalink of @micah.].

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét

Will As We See It Season 2 happen at Prime Video? - Amazon Adviser

He did a lengthy AMA online, where he talks on everything he was told when making a prediction for TV shows before, and after, this season ...